Posts Tagged ‘About’

Posted by admin at 3 September 2010

Category: Apple

Tags: , ,

I’ll admit it. I’ll buy almost anything Apple makes. I was going to hold out on the iPad, but after reading more about it, I wound up in line the first day it was for sale. As they say, resistance is futile.

That’s not the case with the Apple TV. When Apple brings a product out, I expect a small revolution. Some exciting new concept, or new and unique feature. With the Apple TV, it’s certainly lower in price, but instead of revolutionizing the idea of a set-top box, the new unit actually takes features away from the now discarded Apple TV ‘classic’.

First, there is the loss of actually owning a movie or a TV show. When the VCR first appeared in the 70s, the idea of owning a movie was quite unique. Before VHS or Betamax you went to a theater, paid your couple of dollars, or watched the oldies on TV loaded with commercials.

Second, the Apple TV requires an HDMI connection — its HDMI port means you need an HDMI hookup or nothing. I understand the reasons for going with that standard, but I’m still holding on to an older AV receiver, and my ‘classic’ Apple TV works just fine with that.

TUAWWhy I’m not excited about the new Apple TV originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

Posted by admin at 2 September 2010

Category: Apple

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Gamasutra cornered Epic Games’ Mike Capps (he of the very impressive Epic Citadel demo yesterday at the Apple special event), and Capps confirms that what you see running on your iPhone is the real deal — Unreal Engine 3, with all of the bells and whistles that it has on the major HD consoles. The actual game that Project Sword will become is being designed by Chair (which is the same group that did the popular Shadow Complex game for Xbox 360), and we’ll see the full project soon.

Capps also confirms that UE 3 needs at least an iPhone 3GS to run, but he says that in terms of hardware, Apple’s devices are right where they need to be. High-resolution textures are an issue (you can’t install a 15gb game on an 16gb portable device), but the memory and speed are actually there, says Capps. “You’ve got 16 gigs of flash memory,” he says, “which is way better, faster memory than what most people have generally on a home PC. So that stuff works really well.”

The biggest issue holding handheld gaming back is larger environments, but game developers are getting better and better at designing worlds that render quickly and well to all kinds of platforms. And Capps looks into the future, and sees even more possibilities for Apple and their product lines. “It doesn’t take a whole lot of leaps of faith to say, ‘Right now, I can display from my iPad to my Apple TV on a big screen TV.’ How far away are we from ‘that’s my game console, and it’s displaying wirelessly to my television set?’ It’s not far away.”

That’s kind of a trippy thought — that Apple had to finally move away from the Mac to earn a larger foothold in gaming. It’s very heartening, as a gamer and an Apple fan, to hear Capps as excited as he is about the possibilities for iOS and the App Store.

[via Joystiq[

TUAWEpic’s Mike Capps talks about Epic Citadel and the future of iOS gaming originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Thu, 02 Sep 2010 19:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

Posted by admin at 28 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , , , , , ,

You D&D buffs out there were undoubtedly excited to hear that a new Neverwinter game is coming to life, but just like the real D&D, it might end up laying a critical hit down on your wallet.

In an interview at Gamasutra, Cryptic CEO Jack Emmert admitted that the game doesn’t have a business model nailed down yet, and that all options are still on the table, from a “free-to-play with microtransactions” model to a “pay-by-the-minute” one. Emmert makes the point that asking for a subscription is still a viable way to run an MMO — he fully expects BioWare to charge subscriptions for The Old Republic — but that requires meeting a very high standard in terms of its content and quality.

Of course, Neverwinter is described more as a “co-op experience” than an MMO, and Emmert says it is indicative of a “new direction for Cryptic.” Instead of worrying about MMO standards and traditions, he says, Cryptic wants to “just make great games.” Specifically, that means “no more 75 Metacritic scores,” he jokes at the end of the interview. “My heart just can’t take it anymore.”

JoystiqCryptic not yet sure about pricing plan for new Neverwinter title originally appeared on Joystiq on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on Joystiq

Posted by admin at 28 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , , , , , ,

In a recent interview with Develop, FreeStyleGames creative director Jamie Jackson recounted the emotional rollercoaster ride the studio went through from the announcement to the release of their ambitious mixmastering sim, DJ Hero. Well, using that metaphor, said rollercoaster would be awfully boring — everything leading up to the game’s release only served to bring the studio down. Jackson explained, “when the first news of the game came out, and everyone slagged it off, the whole studio was depressed, because we’d given our life to it.” (Yeah, sorry about that.)

Jackson explained that morale was low in the following months — that is, until the universally positive reviews started pouring in. “Everyone else’s opinion on the game had just turned during the release,” Jackson said. “When the review scores came in that just changed the mood of the studio dramatically.” We’re sure the 1.2 million sales over the following eight months didn’t hurt either.

JoystiqFreeStyleGames talks about the highs and lows behind DJ Hero originally appeared on Joystiq on Sat, 28 Aug 2010 02:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on Joystiq

Posted by admin at 25 August 2010

Category: Apple

Tags: , , , , ,

Well now. The previous rumor about 99 cent rentals for TV episodes on iTunes was just your average, but now that we know there’s an Apple event just around the corner, it’s time to start making hay out of all the chaff floating around. A source now tells the Wall Street Journal that Apple is pushing hard for a deal with Disney to nail down cheaper 48-hour rentals, presumably to come through iTunes and the revamped iTV service. Resistance to the deal is coming from TV companies (surprise, surprise), who are leery about putting too much content out through online services, fearing that people will leave their monthly cable bills behind if another service arises.

What’s funny about that, of course, is that Apple sees that’s already happening. Services like Hulu Plus and Netflix are already making cable customers rethink their monthly fees, and so Apple is finding itself with a limited amount of time to get in on the action. The Wall Street Journal says the company is pushing for agreements “before the new television season starts,” but now that we know there’s an event planned for September 1st, it’s more likely Apple is trying to get agreements set up before the announcement. Of course, as Philip Elmer-DeWitt points out, the real economic tradeoff isn’t between the $0.99 rentals and a more lucrative plan the studios come up with — it’s between Apple’s proven iTunes-based economy and the free-range TV programming on BitTorrent.

And with its ties to Disney, odds are that Apple will definitely have enough to go forward, even if it doesn’t have every channel signing on the dotted line just yet. So here’s the question: if Apple does announce a new iTV, and a way to watch new television on demand right away, will you choose a system like that over whatever cable bill you’re currently paying?

TUAWMore murmuring about 99 cent iTunes TV rentals originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

Posted by admin at 18 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , , , , ,

If the Vibrant’s $200 price tag on contract was the only thing keeping you planted on the fence, you might want to head over to T-Mobile’s interwebs right this second seeing how they’re offering a one-day special — $99, online only — which makes it $100 cheaper than AT&T’s Captivate and $150 less than Sprint’s Epic 4G. Any way you slice it, that’s a killer carrier-direct price for a high-end Android phone with a 1GHz core and one of the best phone displays we’ve ever seen… and remember, it includes Avatar, which means you’re getting this for the price of a few Avatar Blu-rays. Yeah, that’s the way to look at it.

[Thanks, Aaron]

T-Mobile offering Vibrant for $99, if you’re quick about it originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:53:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceT-Mobile  | Email this | Comments

View full post on Engadget

Posted by admin at 16 August 2010

Category: Apple

Tags: , , , , ,

The iPhone 3G sold tremendously well in South Korea, and now distributor KT Corporation is hoping the latest model will do the same when pre-orders begin on Wednesday. “We hope the iPhone 4 will draw a hot response from clients as the iPhone 3 did,” a KT Corp. rep said on Monday, noting that the iPhone 4 should be available in South Korea in September.

When iPhone 3G pre-sales began in South Korea, KT Corp. received approximately 65,000 pre-orders. On the day of release, customers had been lined up as early as 26 hours in advance and were rewarded with balloons and a live band.

Apple has sold more than 850,000 iPhones in South Korea since the 3GS went on sale in November of ‘09. Above is a television ad that ran prior to the iPhone 3G’s release.

[Via MacDailyNews]

TUAWiPhone 4 pre-orders about to begin in South Korea originally appeared on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW) on Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

View full post on The Unofficial Apple Weblog (TUAW)

Posted by admin at 16 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Filed under:

In recent months I’ve been losing my mind. I don’t know if I actually have something wrong upstairs, but I have been finding it increasingly hard to keep things — ideas, snippets, variables – in short-term memory. I think, though, that it’s just a symptom of Information Overload. I sit here, hour after hour, day upon day, scanning RSS feeds, IRC rooms and forums. The amount of new data, videos and funny cat photos is simply overwhelming; I can’t keep it all in my head! I guess it’s inevitable that some things spill over the edge.

But it turns out that there might be some help on the horizon for Information Brokers like myself. With the help of brain-stimulating skull electrodes — or, more succinctly, a thinking cap — both the capacity and accuracy of your visual short-term memory can be doubled.

I’ll try and break down the complex biotechnological stuff. We have two anterior temporal lobes (ATL) in our brain, by our left and right temples. The left ATL is for context processing (where have I seen that face or heard that sound before?), while the right ATL is where a lot of visual memory takes place. It’s already been found that those with damaged left ATLs (weaker context processing) have better visual memories (very similar to autists), so the researchers decided to stimulate the right ATL to see if a similar effect could be achieved, without the need to damage the brain!

Sure enough, during testing, stimulating the right ATL improved visual memory by an astonishing 110%! To put it another way, by running a weak non-invasive electrical current across a part of the brain, the participants of this test were granted something similar to photographic memory.

Of course, I don’t know whether memorising shapes (faces, objects, tools) without their context is particularly useful. But I’m interested in the short-term capabilities of such technology. When you forget what you were going to search for in the time it takes to switch to Firefox and open a new browser tab… well… I’ll take what I can get!

Open a new tab and forget what you were about to do? Brain-stimulating skull electrodes may be the solution originally appeared on Download Squad on Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments



Add to digg
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Google
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Facebook
Add to Reddit
Add to Technorati






BrainInformation OverloadMemoryDownload SquadATL

View full post on Download Squad

Posted by admin at 15 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , ,

The file-sharing, copyright and piracy debate continues to burn just as aggressively today as it did with the dawn of Napster. When compared to the seemingly endless wars of words over religion, however, it’s only just begun, but the opposing sides in both debates seem equally polarized. So, for an argument that will probably never end, let’s bring them both together.

religionWhile writing about any contentious issue has its pitfalls – and the file-sharing and copyright debate has many – bringing religion into the mix simply has to be a recipe for disaster. While the debate over copying music and movies has seen people argue aggressively over the Internet for more than a decade, at least no-one has been killed in that particular war. Religion really does have the potential to blow up in one’s face, and in the worst cases, literally.

But religion has so many good sides too and much to say on many issues, so what advice does it have to offer on file-sharing? Is it a sin? Or is sharing with one’s peers a supreme act of kindness and generosity?

As I was brought up by a fairly religious mother active in a branch of the Christian church, perhaps a good place to start is with Jesus, and God. Ok, technically they’re the same, but if we’re going to get bogged down in too many details we’ll be here forever. Bottom line – is file-sharing a sin?

The 8th of The Ten Commandments, Thou Shalt Not Steal, seems the closest direct answer to our question but also raises an age-old piracy dispute – is copying theft? In file-sharing circles the answer is generally ‘no’, one has to deprive the owner of the original in order for a theft to have taken place. But is it as simple as that? Isn’t it the purpose of most religions to offer guidance, to provide a moral compass by which one can lead life?

During the latter part of the previous decade organizations such as the RIAA and MPAA were very keen to press the moral stance of not sharing files, and have suggested that every copy affects the quality of life of someone, somewhere, in the entertainment business. But what happens when all elements collide – when file-sharing, music and Christians come together?

In 2004 the Gospel Music Association conducted a survey to find out how the Christian music industry had been affected by, presumably, Christian pirates.

“Like all other segments of the music industry, our album sales have been affected by the ongoing music piracy committed by consumers,” commented GMA president John W. Styll. “We went into this study wanting to learn more about our young consumers and how their faith intersects with this vital issue. We were somewhat surprised to find that it does not.”

Indeed, the survey found that Christian teens pirated at nearly the same rate as their non-religious peers during the previous 6 months, 77% and 81% respectively. It’s not clear if those questioned felt that their copying failed to constitute a sin or if they simply didn’t care. Nevertheless, copying hasn’t always been considered a sin.

According to all four Gospels, Jesus himself once took five small barley loaves and two small fishes and multiplied them using a kind of biblical BitTorrent swarm to enable the feeding of 5,000 people. They weren’t starving people, it just wasn’t convenient for them to get food where they were at that moment in time. While they all got to eat a very nice meal it could be argued that local fisherman and bakers wouldn’t have appreciated the slump in business, but there again they could have adapted more quickly and followed the demand……Sound familiar?

While the rule of God is all important to followers of a religion, there are other more earthly laws too, and luckily it appears they can work together.

According to Romans 13:1-7, Christians must obey the laws of the government they live under, which for American citizens means no recording a movie in a theater and definitely no up or downloading. British Christians seem to be obeying the rule of God when they cam a movie but file-sharing in either direction is still out. The Dutch, however, can stay on the good side of the Lord by downloading only for personal use.

All these variations means that making an internationally relevant religious decision is quite a task. But despite their differences, many religions have a similar moral base.

Rabbi Joshua Hammerman writing recently in The Jewish Week on whether or not file-sharing is kosher, says it all comes down to drawing the line between sharing and stealing.

“Before Al Gore invented the internet, I used to lend friends cassette tapes and no one arrested me,” he explains. “So why can’t I do the same thing via e-mail? I’m not selling the material. And as one bar mitzvah student put it to me a few years ago, after having downloaded 800 songs on the old Napster, ‘Being part of a sharing community makes me feel like I’m living out the commandment, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.””

But shouldn’t the ‘spirit’ of Thou Shalt Not Steal rise above all other concerns? We’re back to that wavy line again, the one drawn between stealing and sharing. While the exact positioning of that line might be a throwaway issue for some, it will be of particular interest to file-sharers living in the 97% Muslim country of Saudi Arabia.

Governed under Islamic law with the Qur’an as its constitution, persistent thieves can lose a hand as punishment for their crimes. As it stands, Saudi Arabia does not consider copying to be stealing and instead chooses to fine infringers. Today, RapidShare, 4Shared and MediaFire are in the top 30 most-visited sites in the country. If sharing really did become stealing, expect all that to change.

TorrentFreak reader Pastor Burt Wilkins from God’s Church of Faith contacted us a couple of weeks ago with a nice email. While we can’t take credit for the work of the Vuze and uTorrent teams as he suggests, his message still stands.

“My life has been divided between the ministry and programming. Right now after 40 years of programming in 15 different languages I am now retired in the Philippines. I am writing you to tell you how impressed I am with uTorrent and Vuze and I am not one who is easily impressed,” he explains.

“It is written in the Book of Genesis, ‘In the beginning God created …..’ This is what you have done. You have created. Maybe the comparison is a bit of a stretch, but as a result of God’s creation billions of people have now dwelled upon the earth and hopefully benefited from the experience. You have joined that special category of special creatures that create and quite obviously millions of people have benefited from that creation.”

“I have now become a user of your program and find what you have created as awe inspiring. You have done something significant and something wonderful. I appreciate and I think understand what you have done and the journey that this has taken you on. I can see your dedication, determination and sense of vision,” he concludes.

Those familiar with the 4th commandment will recognize that by publishing this article today, I am in breach of it, but times have moved on so hopefully most people will forgive me for this particular sin. Time will tell if the various Gods in the universe will choose to forgive those who copy music and movies, or those who merely covet their neighbor’s files.

Article from: TorrentFreak.

View full post on TorrentFreak

Posted by admin at 14 August 2010

Category: Tech Industry

Tags: , , , ,

Filed under: ,

Well, geez, color me embarrassed. If you’ve read my original post about Google’s net neutrality proposal, you probably know I got hoodwinked by Google’s promises of an FCC-regulated, perfectly neutral wired internet, which turned out to be nothing more than a sleight-of-hand distraction from its suspicious lack of promises of neutrality on wireless networks and future technologies.

Yeah, wires are still huge now, but wireless networks are carrying a bigger chunk of our traffic every day. I’m not claiming to be the most astute analyst out there, but I figure I’m not the only one who didn’t read Google’s proposal carefully enough. So, upon further reflection, here are some of the things that strike me completely screwed up about it:

“Additional Online Services”:

The proposal leaves “additional online services” unprotected, and that’s a scarily broad exception. Anything that replaces broadband and delivers the same Internet content and services in the future is exempted from Google’s mandate for neutrality. Just covering broadband isn’t good enough, and this is a loophole you could drive a truck through. Not good.

The Wireless Problem:

While wireless traffic discrimination does have to be “transparent,” all that means is that Google or other big service providers have to tell us when some data gets special treatment. It certainly doesn’t do anything to ensure neutrality or keep companies from setting up priority delivery of each other’s content … we’ll just have to watch them do it publicly. Again, not good enough.

That’s just scratching the surface. For a deeper (but still very readable) analysis of the problems with Google’s proposal, check out this article by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Why I was completely wrong about Google and net neutrality originally appeared on Download Squad on Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:30:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments



Add to digg
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Google
Add to StumbleUpon
Add to Facebook
Add to Reddit
Add to Technorati






GoogleElectronic Frontier FoundationNetwork neutralityFederal Communications CommissionWireless network

View full post on Download Squad